In which they describe two paragraphs of boilerplate that addresses the substance of a 37 page document *not at all* as "detailed"
-
-
my process has been 1. angry emails 2. angry tweets. to be followed by 3. go outside
-
I'll throw something on your behalf then. No kids or small animals I might accidentally hit.
-
my cat isn't a SMALL animal
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@emptywheel I guess step 4 will be to follow the helpful suggestion to "seek out" the Intelligence Transparency CouncilThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@emptywheel though that would have been easier with, oh, the name or email of a point of contact. Maybe they're in the Dagobah system... -
If only you had a smart phone on wheels that could hack entire empire IT, you might get contact name or hell, even Eatinger's.
-
I tried Eatinger's & Fredman's LinkedIn Inmail to give them chance to respond since that was only contact info I could come up w
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Holding out for Audible version bc some rock star read it, which 1) hasn't been released 2) won't throw well
@Krhawkins5@ddayen -
I was *supposed* to have James Mitchell's book to throw
-
Sure but you'd have been throwing that bc you were throwing that. Not bc our country has gone nuts.
@laRosalind@ddayen
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.