The question on whether to reform 702 must rest on more than just how many USP communications are in the haystack. Query, Use matter.
@pwnallthethings So the same level of non-info on a 702 cert would seem possible. @MiekeEoyang
-
-
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang It would certainly seem reasonable for DNI to consider it, and if it's not possible, to explain publicly why not. -
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang Or to say, for example, here are the six big ones; rest are classified, but in total cover 10k non-USP selectors. -
@pwnallthethings@emptywheel there's not a cyber one. We explicitly considered, declined to authorize. Which is why they wanted CISA. -
@emptywheel@pwnallthethings 5 & 6 on that chart seem speculative to me. That said, if that's the fear, controls can be put in to fix it. -
@MiekeEoyang Chart's not mine, it's Mayer's. My point is that telecoms always do the scan, so can do same scan under CISA@pwnallthethings -
@emptywheel@pwnallthethings But the data searched for matters. My concern was always the definition of "signature." -
@MiekeEoyang Agree. My sense is DHS implementation mostly sound, but as passed set up to bypass that really easily.@pwnallthethings - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.