The question on whether to reform 702 must rest on more than just how many USP communications are in the haystack. Query, Use matter.
@MiekeEoyang One thing I'm rather surprised by is no one has asked for declass of number, type of certificates. @pwnallthethings
-
-
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang I wonder if they could declassify the number (but not category) of certs, and the number of targets within each one -
@pwnallthethings Suspect big reason don't want to declassify WHAT certs are bc "foreign govt" one makes clear 702 not terror@MiekeEoyang -
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang Maybe. Some certs would essentially formally acknowledge specific target groups, which State & DNI won't ever allow -
@pwnallthethings So the same level of non-info on a 702 cert would seem possible.@MiekeEoyang -
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang It would certainly seem reasonable for DNI to consider it, and if it's not possible, to explain publicly why not. -
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang Or to say, for example, here are the six big ones; rest are classified, but in total cover 10k non-USP selectors. -
@pwnallthethings@emptywheel there's not a cyber one. We explicitly considered, declined to authorize. Which is why they wanted CISA. - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.