@JakeLaperruque We've known they don't need open criminal investigations since PCLOB, which said they could use for assessments.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel did that specify criminal? I don't recall reading anything like the FISC line from the procedures which says any federal crime5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Though explicit permission to use *pre* opening any assessment does go beyond PCLOB language, no?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes. Even more concerning to me is "are not limited to" language, which says it's not even just assessments@JakeLaperruque1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Right; per the quote from the FBI minimization procedures, any fed crime with a future nexus@charlie_savage3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JakeLaperruque Here's how I read that passage:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/04/22/former-top-holder-aide-says-back-door-searches-violate-fourth-amendment-fisc-judge-thomas-hogan-doesnt-care/ … @charlie_savagepic.twitter.com/3ZsE45vhAL
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.