DOJ has been charging Chinese Americans with espionage because it's too dumb to understand what they actually do. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/us/after-missteps-us-tightens-rules-for-national-security-cases.html …
-
-
Replying to @B_Meson
@B_Meson Yeah, I reacted to that too, but in this context it's supposed to be a good thing.@copiesofcopies1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@B_Meson what is the charitable interpretation of that quote? I'm not seeing it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies "We mean to exercise additional oversight over a broadly defined set of cases."@B_Meson1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies But it's not clear she assessed why those cases went off the rails. People misinterpreted 702 backdoor info? Translations?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel or they were based on racist tips and shoddy circumstantial evidence from the get-go.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@copiesofcopies IMO "NatSec" is another word for "warrantless collex analyzed in ways that may not stand up to scrutiny."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.