DOJ has been charging Chinese Americans with espionage because it's too dumb to understand what they actually do. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/us/after-missteps-us-tightens-rules-for-national-security-cases.html …
-
-
@emptywheel@B_Meson what is the charitable interpretation of that quote? I'm not seeing it. -
@copiesofcopies "We mean to exercise additional oversight over a broadly defined set of cases."@B_Meson -
@emptywheel ah! Thank you! -
@copiesofcopies But it's not clear she assessed why those cases went off the rails. People misinterpreted 702 backdoor info? Translations? -
@emptywheel or they were based on racist tips and shoddy circumstantial evidence from the get-go. -
@copiesofcopies IMO "NatSec" is another word for "warrantless collex analyzed in ways that may not stand up to scrutiny."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.