@KDbyProxy Hard to get a meaningful answer as 95% of commentary--both expert and TradMed--on amicus has not made 2(A) 2(B) distinction.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel As u noted, there was no 2(A)-qualified person at that time. And so it appears judge appointed a 2(A) person using 2(B).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @KDbyProxy
@KDbyProxy And here that may have been pertinent. Did she get to see relevant violations? Did she get to see CIA/NSA "we can supercede MPs"?
3:11 PM - 22 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.