@emptywheel @ErrataRob But again, that's her job. Otherwise, why take it? As for doing one's all for one's client…http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/supreme_court_dispatches/2016/04/scotus_drunk_driving_case_looks_good_for_the_drunk_drivers.html …
@KDbyProxy The reason 2(B) is important is bc FISC made a long stink abt being able to get what they wanted already pre-passage @ErrataRob
-
-
@emptywheel@ErrataRob I cited Duties graff b/c it does provide context regardless. If u want, U of Richmond LR… http://lawreview.richmond.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Anderson.pdf … -
@KDbyProxy It is your practice as a lawyer to say that clauses sitting next to the ones that are operative have some kind of halo effect? -
@emptywheel Sec 401 wld work w/o Duties graff; Duties graff pretty much states what a crt-appnted amicus does, w/ sm sub matter words added. -
@KDbyProxy Duties graph explicitly describes only what a 2(A) amicus might do. Its irrelevant to what a discretionary 2(B) amicus might. -
@emptywheel Duties graff is little more than surplusage; just states what a crt-appnted amicus does – w/ ref to this court's jurisdiction. -
@KDbyProxy Again, it states what a 2(A) appointed amicus does. It explicitly does not apply to a 2(B) amicus.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.