@emptywheel @ErrataRob Yes, lawyers vigorously argue on behalf of their clients. One day, for gov't; another day, for ppl being surveilled.
@KDbyProxy One thing we DON'T know is whether he permitted her to consider 2 years of violations on directly relevant issues @ErrataRob
-
-
@emptywheel@ErrataRob As to "Who is this amicus' client?"… I took my shot, but maybe post Q to ur twitterverse. I'd lk to see those replies -
@KDbyProxy Does it change given that he didn't appoint her under the clause you thought he had?@ErrataRob -
@emptywheel@ErrataRob U tweeted from the appointment Auth paragraph; I tweeted the Duties paragraph. Both in Section 401. -
@KDbyProxy False. He appointed her under 2(B), not 2(A), as made clear in the cite from opinion.@ErrataRob
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.