@ThePlumLineGS Can you point to where he made that EXPLICIT case in the debate? I'm not seeing it. "As if to say" = your interp @Pachacutec_
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ 2) the ad also says that big banks "get" tax breaks in return for speaking fees2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Also in that dead drop!!! You apparently BADLY want to *interpret* a QPQ here. Why?@Pachacutec_4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Read the exchange where Bash asks for a specific example of a Hillary policy "because of the money she received"3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Bash did not say, "Name action Hillary took bc GS paid her." She said, Name policy H took bc she favors banks@Pachacutec_1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Bash said, name a "decision" she made "because of money received." He supplied her position on banks and cited fees4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS The DEMOCRATIC theory is access=ideology [favoring] = actions. That's what Bash asked.@Pachacutec_2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ my reading of the exchange is at least as reasonable as yours is. But here's what I propose. 1/22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Here's what *I* propose: you *correct* your post w/full quote, and then try to justify your interpretation?@Pachacutec_1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ I already justified it. You are now running interference for his *explicit claims.*3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS I've said I don't think Goldman speeches are what Bernie suggests they are, I base that on HILLARY'S explanation @Pachacutec_
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.