@ThePlumLineGS "Directly linked." There you go back to QPQ again. @Pachacutec_
-
-
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ I already justified it. You are now running interference for his *explicit claims.* -
@ThePlumLineGS NO! Again, you're saying your interpretation off partial quote = "Explicit." That's not English, Greg.@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ asked for a "decision" she made "because" of money, Sanders explicitly cited her position on banks + speaking fees. -
@ThePlumLineGS Again, with the purposeful mangling of quotes, Greg? Please practice responsible journalism and use full quote.@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel If you don't see this piece as balanced and a good faith effort to be fair to both sides, we'll have to agree to disagree. -
@ThePlumLineGS So this is not abt "balance" tho suggestion is cute. It's abt your misquotation to support claims that aren't supported. -
@emptywheel "misquotation" ... except the piece reproduces the whole sentence of her question. You're making it up at this point. -
@ThePlumLineGS Neither of those little linguistic moves are supported by evidence. They're where you invent QPQ out of whole cloth. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.