@ThePlumLineGS @jayrosen_nyu not sure body of evidence & history, sanders campaign strategy aside, supports that
@ThePlumLineGS Can you point to where he made that EXPLICIT case in the debate? I'm not seeing it. "As if to say" = your interp @Pachacutec_
-
-
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Now you're just running interference for him. By contrast, I acknowledge the force of much of his argument. -
@ThePlumLineGS I asked you to justify the word choice you used. Explicit means something, and it's not "what I've interpreted"@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ 1) the ad says that big banks "get" a rigged economy in return for speaking fees. -
@ThePlumLineGS Yes, Hillary puts "rigged economy" into envelope and leaves it in a dead drop. You're playing word games, Greg.@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@ThePlumLineGS@Pachacutec_ it seems like the question is: is he actually saying she's crooked or just implying it? -
@gretared IMO he's saying that when people pay you for access you spend time with them & hear their viewpoints.@ThePlumLineGS@Pachacutec_
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ 2) the ad also says that big banks "get" tax breaks in return for speaking fees -
@ThePlumLineGS Also in that dead drop!!! You apparently BADLY want to *interpret* a QPQ here. Why?@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Read the exchange where Bash asks for a specific example of a Hillary policy "because of the money she received" -
@ThePlumLineGS Bash did not say, "Name action Hillary took bc GS paid her." She said, Name policy H took bc she favors banks@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Bash said, name a "decision" she made "because of money received." He supplied her position on banks and cited fees -
@ThePlumLineGS The DEMOCRATIC theory is access=ideology [favoring] = actions. That's what Bash asked.@Pachacutec_ -
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ my reading of the exchange is at least as reasonable as yours is. But here's what I propose. 1/2 -
@ThePlumLineGS Here's what *I* propose: you *correct* your post w/full quote, and then try to justify your interpretation?@Pachacutec_ - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.