@ThePlumLineGS @jayrosen_nyu not sure body of evidence & history, sanders campaign strategy aside, supports that
-
-
Replying to @Pachacutec_
@Pachacutec_@jayrosen_nyu so every D pol who benefits from corporate $ automatically participates in quid pro quo corruption?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Is it your view that your article addresses quid pro quo, which it doesn't mention?@Pachacutec_@jayrosen_nyu2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_@jayrosen_nyu the piece explicitly discusses policy positions reached in exchange for $$$.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS 1) "exchange" is not necessarily QPQ 2) that's further than evidence supported@Pachacutec_@jayrosen_nyu1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ Thats fair point. But Bernie agreed at debate that Hillary opposes breaking up banks precisely b/c of speaking fees2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Hillary has an ideological position that doesn't even see problem w/big banks (or their crimes!)@Pachacutec_2 replies 6 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Pachacutec_ And that's a legitimate criticism. Do you agree that her position on banks is directly linked to speaking fees?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS "Directly linked." There you go back to QPQ again.@Pachacutec_1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel @Pachacutec_Because Bernie SAID THIS. Why won't Bernie supporters own his actual positions?5 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
@ThePlumLineGS SAID WHAT? Your piece engages in a great deal of rhetorical slipperiness. @Pachacutec_Because
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.