@ncardozo @KDbyProxy I've seen no indication they intended to restrict this to stored data. Why would they?
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy It specifically includes communication providers in the definition.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy that language is arguably a relic of the Stored Communications Act, though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @copiesofcopies
@copiesofcopies@mattblaze@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy Defintion of technical assist. includes while in "transmission" (12)(C)(i)1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kurtopsahl
@kurtopsahl DiFi bitched abt encrypted data in motion. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/03/10/in-bizarre-move-dianne-feinstein-attacks-tech-companies-for-profiting-off-of-packet-sniffing/ …@copiesofcopies@mattblaze@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@kurtopsahl@mattblaze@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy very weird.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @copiesofcopies
@emptywheel@kurtopsahl@mattblaze@normative@ncardozo@KDbyProxy but this would seem to codify "Lavabit orders" which makes sense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@copiesofcopies No use passing encryption bill doesn't retroactively justify that @kurtopsahl @mattblaze @normative @ncardozo @KDbyProxy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.