@ThePlumLineGS But YOU are making more extended claim, which is why you should consider "wonk" policing that Hillary's surrogates engage in
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm skeptical of this idea that "wonk policing" is inherently illegitimate. It seems like the policy argument we want to have2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS WUH? You endorse replacing actual rational debate w/bigwigs saying "only what I believe is rational"? That's nuts!3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel This "wonk policing" is simply *argument.* I'm not endorsing their view, just saying it's not inherently out of bounds1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Um, yes. But it is argument based NOT on evidence and outcomes but on self-selecting certification divorced from facts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Fine, but it is not INHERENTLY out of bounds or illegitimate.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS But it is PRECISELY what Bernie doing. After months and months of Hillary doing same w/no criticism now it's out of bounds?1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Let's back up. What's your problem with my piece? (A number of Bernie backers have tweeted it approvingly, BTW.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS You further suggest Bernie's just about corruption and not competence. Which it is.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If anything, this piece is sympathetic to Bernie's argument. Come on. This sensitivity is getting out of hand.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS I'm not raising this out of sensitivity. I'm happy to say Bernie should not call Hillary unqualified.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.