If Chait weren't male would he still be considered a serious commentator? Much less a "wonk"?
@JakeLaperruque But aren't they validated on a slightly different stage? I mean, sure, Chait is marginally more serious than Brooks. But NYT
-
-
@emptywheel Yeah, I guess Dowd isn't a "wonk" (Ingram probably?). It's a good point, but I think a lot of these guys are just invulnerable -
@emptywheel Also when you talk that much some things will be silly. To me Richard Cohen and Bill Krystol are in their own always-wrong spot -
@JakeLaperruque Agree. But I think Chait is the Cohen in waiting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.