We should write down basic rules, then create-I dunno-some kind of system, perhaps where we pick a representative...https://twitter.com/rachelmetz/status/711967256918360064 …
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey But then they might pass CALEA and then where would the FBI be?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I've been wrong plenty of times. But I'll still be utterly stunned if the whole "CALEA as comprehensive scheme" bit flies...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey In any case, in such cases where there is dispute we don't generally just have magistrates decide in secret.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Look, maybe it'll work. Olson's pretty great. But the faith that's been invested in this view is just not supported by case law.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Most lawyers I read say the opposite, w/actual citations, which leads me to believe that is a contested argument at worst.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I've fought the "CALEA doesn't freaking apply here" battle enough. If a judge decides it does, then I'm wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel But I don't see it as meriting much consideration up to and until then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey So you're the one opposed to our system of law, separation of powers, not those who are waiting for both processes to work.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Come again? I have no objection to court deciding cases. And think Congress needs to pass law regardless of court outcome.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Oh. By your suggestion this was contrary to democracy you suggested differently.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.