@emptywheel @csoghoian DDIR is referring to specific target loss tied to Snowden disclosure. They didn't wait 3 years to be careless now.
-
-
-
@emptywheel@csoghoian My entire point is the IC need to bring concrete evidence to public to avoid exactly this kind of "explaining away." -
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel@csoghoian Need case-studies, not numbers. Losing 1 in a Pres' outer-office >>> loss of 100 bit players in ISIL -
@pwnallthethings I agree. Tell the story. Prove it. But I view even that level of detail as a huge step forward.@emptywheel@csoghoian -
@Susan_Hennessey But it doesn't say what you claim it does. It raises more Qs abt credibility.@pwnallthethings@csoghoian -
@emptywheel@pwnallthethings@csoghoian "Those disclosures" = "Snowden disclosures." How else can it be read? -
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel@pwnallthethings@csoghoian I'm curious how much loss is genuinely due to new, previously totally unknown info -
@normative Right. PRISM was in no way secret. But Telegram also didn't exist until Aug 2013@Susan_Hennessey@pwnallthethings@csoghoian - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.