@Susan_Hennessey No one believes NSA can't hack this phone. & before everything got "recorded" FBI still got content w/its own (legal) bugs.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm writing a response to Clarke's interview right now. But both government + Apple stipulate on record only Apple can do it.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel James Clapper also stipulated something on the record, once.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
@ericgeller@emptywheel What does "can" even mean here? A world with no rules, no laws? Where Apple sits in Pyongyang?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@ericgeller@emptywheel And assuming capacity did exist, is this the road we really want? Tech says to US IC "Beat me if you can..."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel If capacity does exist, then this current process is basically govt saying "make it easy for us," no?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
@ericgeller@emptywheel I think this inserts troubling confusion, fails to see the new law and policies this would implicate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey How so? FBI uses outside forensics all the time to access phones. It is status quo, not new thing.@ericgeller1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ericgeller I don't know any legal precedent that says DOJ has obligation to consult with IC to assert "necessity."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel@ericgeller Judge could decide otherwise, but I *think* that would be a new read of the obligation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey As would writing new code. @ericgeller
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.