@Susan_Hennessey If FBI wanted us to trust it, it should aspire to the same level of transparency as No Such Agency has.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't deny there are people who--for reasons good and bad--do not trust the government to play by the rules.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel But that should be confronted on it's own terms, not by the confused rhetoric merging that private value with scientific facts.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey What does this mean? "confused rhetoric merging that private value with scientific facts"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The private belief that government can't be trusted with the "science" argument that any access is backdoor, all access alike.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Also do you scare quote the word "science" when talking about climate change?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No. False equivalency. I believe many of tech's arguments, primarily that any mechanism introduces theoretical risk.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel Where I see ideological conflation is then being told there is no way to evaluate or manage a risk, or all risks are the same.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey ISn't LE doing same? Pretending no way to solve crimes except for access to nifty new tools they didn't use to have?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't view that as the stated position, but any LE is saying "without this no crimes can be solved" that's false.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Well, FBI's credibility on value of THIS phone is piss-poor, so that doesn't help things.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.