Bingo. Crypto-libertarian: Not derogatory, but people who want technology to assert a personal preference over law. https://twitter.com/csoghoian/status/709444638113984512 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey If FBI wanted us to trust it, it should aspire to the same level of transparency as No Such Agency has.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't deny there are people who--for reasons good and bad--do not trust the government to play by the rules.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel But that should be confronted on it's own terms, not by the confused rhetoric merging that private value with scientific facts.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey What does this mean? "confused rhetoric merging that private value with scientific facts"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The private belief that government can't be trusted with the "science" argument that any access is backdoor, all access alike.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Also do you scare quote the word "science" when talking about climate change?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No. False equivalency. I believe many of tech's arguments, primarily that any mechanism introduces theoretical risk.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel Where I see ideological conflation is then being told there is no way to evaluate or manage a risk, or all risks are the same.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Also ignoring that general practice with all other locks is to open them themselves?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.