Bingo. Crypto-libertarian: Not derogatory, but people who want technology to assert a personal preference over law. https://twitter.com/csoghoian/status/709444638113984512 …
@Susan_Hennessey What does this mean? "confused rhetoric merging that private value with scientific facts"
-
-
@emptywheel The private belief that government can't be trusted with the "science" argument that any access is backdoor, all access alike. -
@Susan_Hennessey Also do you scare quote the word "science" when talking about climate change? -
@emptywheel No. False equivalency. I believe many of tech's arguments, primarily that any mechanism introduces theoretical risk. -
@emptywheel Where I see ideological conflation is then being told there is no way to evaluate or manage a risk, or all risks are the same. -
@Susan_Hennessey ISn't LE doing same? Pretending no way to solve crimes except for access to nifty new tools they didn't use to have? -
@emptywheel I don't view that as the stated position, but any LE is saying "without this no crimes can be solved" that's false. -
@emptywheel But just as false is pretending content of communications can be replaced, or that it isn't dispositive in many cases. -
@Susan_Hennessey No one believes NSA can't hack this phone. & before everything got "recorded" FBI still got content w/its own (legal) bugs. - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.