-
-
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson@michaelwprice@bradheath Also, given USG can use 702 for kiddie porn, want to bet this was parallel construction?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson@michaelwprice Dunno. The judge said he'd been singled out for secondary inspection many times before.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @bradheath
@bradheath@RachelBLevinson@michaelwprice Couldn't that support my suspicion? Or you're suggesting that happened before 2014 change?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson@michaelwprice Before, I think. 18 entries to US in 2 years, 3 prior secondary inspections.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @bradheath
@bradheath Tho the kiddie porn NCMEC rule doesn't mean they weren't pursuing kiddie porn before.@RachelBLevinson@michaelwprice2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel True. Initial basis for secondary was that he was returning from Cancun (area "known for" sex tourism), and seemed nervous.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
@bradheath Right. It just seemed like an invented parallel construction claim. "Seems nervous" could be claimed abt anyone in customs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.