@emptywheel Good spot. Had to look it up- Apple won that motion vs Samsung, but @RicoTetrazini has a good point re: existing evidence
-
-
-
@FedcourtJunkie I think between that reference and the Lavabit one that is the threat DOJ is making. Existing source code.@RicoTetrazini -
@emptywheel@FedcourtJunkie@RicoTetrazini In this case "produce = provide something already written". Yes? Not "produce = write new code". -
@NathanDeckinga Yes. But given this reference to Lavabit https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/03/10/doj-to-apple-start-cooperating-or-youll-get-the-lavabit-treatment/ … think they're threatening it@FedcourtJunkie@RicoTetrazini -
@emptywheel@FedcourtJunkie@RicoTetrazini FBI/Apple=Write new code for sure. Apple/Samsung=Turn over existing. I read emptywheel on RSS. -
@emptywheel@FedcourtJunkie@RicoTetrazini Still pissed that the lavabit revelations got GrokLaw shut down.#GrokLawForever
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
@emptywheel Self incrimination always applies to testimony, not to speech between a company and its customers@FedcourtJunkieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@FedcourtJunkie These 2 things are unrelated. 1 is about existing evidence, the other the forced creation of something new.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.