@emptywheel @JakeLaperruque Again, I've never commented on or defending the process or passage of CISA. Just the words.
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Though I probably would (with some caveats) if I was going to go into it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel Worth it just to hear case for Intel Cmte secret intro/markup, because I've never heard a good reason for that3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque@emptywheel Not getting baiting into discussing interagency+wasn't part of congressional process. Voted. Conferenced. Voted.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Well, it wasn't conferenced, but my point is more on a vote in secret is a big qualifier for voting@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque@emptywheel It was conferenced, just not to your personal preference. No "formal" conference.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Nope. Sorry. You're simply wrong there. It was "negotiated between houses." Not conferenced.@JakeLaperruque1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque If you mean the formal conference with all committee of jurisdiction under rules, then no, it wasn't.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey And again, a formal conference would have started w/base bills. In a few key areas, this went beyond them.@JakeLaperruque1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque A formal conference would have included committees like Energy. It would have been impossible nonstarter.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Again this was referenced clearly by players in both houses before "passage." @JakeLaperruque
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.