@emptywheel @JakeLaperruque I'm not what such a piece would say. I think the substance of CISA, not ideal, is basically good.
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque And I don't see any insightful link to it's passage and the current Apple debate. As least not in current form.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey You're just really unhappy Congress didn't buck what you unconvincingly suggest was HEAVY lobbying fr Apple@JakeLaperruque1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Well, the arc of history and what not. I'm hopeful they'll do so now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Or if they say, "after USG got Apple's clearance holders compromised we think better to let them decide?@JakeLaperruque1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Sure. All I've got is an opinion and potentially naive faith in the process.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Which is why OmniCISA is relevant. It's a pretty abusive version of process.@JakeLaperruque2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Again, I've never commented on or defending the process or passage of CISA. Just the words.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel@JakeLaperruque Though I probably would (with some caveats) if I was going to go into it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey@emptywheel Worth it just to hear case for Intel Cmte secret intro/markup, because I've never heard a good reason for that3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JakeLaperruque And didn't account for the several ways CISA actually made use of signatures less likely. @Susan_Hennessey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.