@emptywheel Nope. I'm saying that to the extent Apple asserts lack of law as defense in court, notable that it doesn't support actual law.
@Susan_Hennessey It apparently seems unbelievable to you that Congress might not always bow to IC requests. Agree, usu is. @normative
-
-
@emptywheel@normative So Congress should pass laws you agree with, but if they disagree they need to wait longer and learn more? Got it. -
@emptywheel@normative Also, I actually support the idea of a commission (and appeared w/ McCaul and Warner yesterday endorsing their plan). -
@emptywheel@normative But I endorse what bipartisan bill deems necessary, not Apple claiming it wants Congress to decide. It doesn't. -
@Susan_Hennessey You seem to be FAR more offended by Apple's tactical statements than FBI's equally dishonest ones.@normative -
@emptywheel@normative Maybe. Certainly think more candid sides can be about equities the better. I think gov is being pretty clear here. -
@Susan_Hennessey I find that claim laughable, to put it as politely as I can.@normative -
@emptywheel@normative Ok. You can side with your big bad multinational corporation and I'll side w/ civil liberties trampling Big Gov here. -
@Susan_Hennessey Moreover, that siding w/security in this case coincides with Apple does not mean I never criticize Apple.@normative - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.