@emptywheel Fed courts here not secret. It's possible there is genuine faith in commission here. There are examples of success (eg 9/11 com)
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey They were until DOJ drew the unlucky straw of James Orenstein, would still be if not for that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Apple doesn't seem to be making the EDNY argument (it's as weak now as it was then).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel I think DOJ's CDCA claim that would have been challenged regardless of judge. Presuming Apple is being honest on equities.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey FBI got AWA orders pertaining to 3 iOS8+ phones before this one we wouldn't know about if not for Orenstein.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I presume (but don't know) that Apple would have challenged whatever order emerged first if "won't write new code" was redline.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel Plus, you sort of intimate there is something improper about ex parte orders and compliance. But that's just the practice.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@emptywheel Neither companies nor gov could manage an adversarial process for each order. Hence the need for clear rules.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey And FBI is still picking and choosing what Apple is permitted to say.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Meh, I don't object to Apple challenging the order in CDCA (or anywhere) but ex parte not a conspiracy theory.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Funny. Bc two MoCs just said they think it's their job to rule on this. Didn't think sep of powers was conspiracy theory.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.