.@DemFromCT @emptywheel @Apinak Now not state-based, publicly funded, "public option" high risk pools. Let's not do that...now. It's worse.
-
-
Replying to @stuart_zechman
@stuart_zechman@DemFromCT@emptywheel@Apinak Not a high risk pool. Nothing to stop states from creating public option for all subsid-elig1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @xpostfactoid
@xpostfactoid1
@stuart_zechman@emptywheel@Apinak starting in 2017, i think.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DemFromCT
@DemFromCT@stuart_zechman@emptywheel@Apinak Yes. States can rejigger whole scheme - funding equiv to subsidies for current enrollees1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xpostfactoid
@xpostfactoid1
@DemFromCT@stuart_zechman@emptywheel@Apinak right now not many states prepping 1332: MA, MN, HI at least2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bjdickmayhew
@bjdickmayhew@DemFromCT@stuart_zechman@emptywheel@Apinak True, but Clinton could give a push, loosen innovation waiver rules.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xpostfactoid
@xpostfactoid1
@bjdickmayhew@DemFromCT@stuart_zechman@emptywheel@Apinak This could actually be excellent, depending on how it’s done.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @charles_gaba
@charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1@bjdickmayhew@DemFromCT@emptywheel@Apinak If same Jon Grubers, David Cutlers, et al designing, it'll be bad.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stuart_zechman
@stuart_zechman @xpostfactoid1@bjdickmayhew@DemFromCT@emptywheel@Apinak Out of curiosity, aside from being state-based, what’s the beef?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charles_gaba
@stuart_zechman @xpostfactoid1@bjdickmayhew@DemFromCT@emptywheel@Apinak The reason for state-based is a) nat’l would never get thru…3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charles_gaba You mean never would after reconciliation taken off table. @stuart_zechman @xpostfactoid1 @bjdickmayhew @DemFromCT @Apinak
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charles_gaba@stuart_zechman @xpostfactoid1@DemFromCT@Apinak are you still fighting what was not in 2010 & not what may 2017?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bjdickmayhew
@bjdickmayhew Somehow those who miscalculated still treated as credible.@charles_gaba@stuart_zechman @xpostfactoid1@DemFromCT@Apinak0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.