@KDbyProxy Do you have extended rant against hard drive co that doesn't back up user data? FAR MORE intel lost there in SB. @Susan_Hennessey
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @KDbyProxy
@KDbyProxy These are rhetorical Qs, of course, but do expose double standards here.@Susan_Hennessey1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy I'm not sure I really follow. Government is saying in this case, based on fact in evidence, they believe law compels.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey There is such a point where FBI says, "impossible to get," as they presumably have w/hard drive.@KDbyProxy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy I think "necessity" only applies to specific info. Gov must prove no other way (w/in scope of obligation) to get it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey "Necessity" also presumes "possible," w/breathtaking scope here. Not possible in hard drive case, so not argued@KDbyProxy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy Wait, breathtaking limited scope (in term of gov obligation) or expansive scope (possible=writing the new code)?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Defining "necessity" as coerced labor by speech-writing coders@KDbyProxy5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Susan_Hennessey US laws require bakers to write customer's msg on cake evn if baker doesn't lk msg. R coders "btr" than bakers?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KDbyProxy US law requires bakers that write customer messages to write any message, doesn't require bakers to write msgs @Susan_Hennessey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.