Totally agree with @emptywheel on this. When it comes to US corporate compliance with US law, love it or leave it.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/701487160839507968 …
@Susan_Hennessey There is such a point where FBI says, "impossible to get," as they presumably have w/hard drive. @KDbyProxy
-
-
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy I think "necessity" only applies to specific info. Gov must prove no other way (w/in scope of obligation) to get it. -
@Susan_Hennessey "Necessity" also presumes "possible," w/breathtaking scope here. Not possible in hard drive case, so not argued@KDbyProxy -
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy Wait, breathtaking limited scope (in term of gov obligation) or expansive scope (possible=writing the new code)? -
@Susan_Hennessey Defining "necessity" as coerced labor by speech-writing coders@KDbyProxy -
@emptywheel@KDbyProxy I think that goes to burden. Necessity is just government need--though there is argument gov obligation too limited.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.