There are some embarrassing errors in the "Bernie turnout" arg, exemplified in this piece. http://www.vox.com/2016/2/21/11081086/bernie-sanders-nevada?utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=article%3Atop&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter … See if you can find it.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Hmm, not at first sight, really… Any pointers? ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
@PeterMonnerjahn Start by thinking about what the numbers we're looking at represent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel AFAICT, they represent lower interest among Dem primary voters compared w 2008. Why *that* wld be, I cldn’t say.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
@PeterMonnerjahn Well, for starters it shows CAUCUS turnout is WAY down, PRIMARY turnout is down somewhat. That's one place to start.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterMonnerjahn
@PeterMonnerjahn A number of questions not even addressed stem from that one.
10:57 AM - 21 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.