And here's a very able journalist, who thinks LOL is an answer -- because, I suspect, there isn't one.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/699375445377163264 …
@OllieWH22 You do know there have been a long series of settlements confirming underlying facts of Goldman theft? @szorowitz @JoeConason
-
-
@emptywheel@szorowitz@JoeConason do you know diff b/w civil & crim liability? b/w settlement & having to prove case to jury? -
@emptywheel@szorowitz@JoeConason send findings & analysis of how they meet requitsite legal std for indi crim liab. since you're so sure -
@OllieWH22 Well, that's what juries are for. Juries not given oppty.@szorowitz@JoeConason -
@emptywheel@szorowitz@JoeConason lots of room for reasonable judgment calls. if you roll dice, you may get nothing. -
@OllieWH22 True. Tho actually prosecuting would provide enough evidence actual homeowners could sue.@szorowitz@JoeConason -
@emptywheel@szorowitz@JoeConason esp if, as you claim, facts are all laid out in settlements anyway -
@OllieWH22 Oh. I guess you're NOT familiar w/foreclosure fraud settlement. I see.@szorowitz@JoeConason -
@emptywheel@szorowitz@JoeConason even moreso when it's a "civil libertarian" arguing for prison sentences without regard for law. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.