@DanaHoule I agree Hillary is still more likely. But I also think it's unclear how she would play against Trump.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel i think in a conventional campaign he gets slaughtered. And I think he wouldn't be capable of suppressing misogyny.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule In a conventional year. But in a conventional year he also doesn't get nomination & Hillary would be FAR stronger than she is2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ...came in 2012 to Romney flopping. If Adelson had funded Newt before IA, or kept funding him after SC, it would have been chaos1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule And you're assuming Mitt was clearly strongest--he wasn't necessarily for reasons Hillary will have (weaker) weaknesses as well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Of course I assume Mitt was the strongest in 2012. He ran against Mitt, Huckleberry, Santorum, et al. Seems kinda obvious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule Were it not for Santorum's anti-women policies, which he adopted just in time for MI where they killed him, he'd have been better1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Except that part about nobody in the GOP thinking he had any chance for the nomination OR to win in November1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule Yes. Precisely the same people who didn't think Trump or Cruz has any chance this year.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No. I never thought Santorum had a chance & said it at the time. I always thought Cruz & Trump were serious threats. I don’t…2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanaHoule You (and I) were fairly alone when saying Trump had a chance. Yuge difference stems from $$ Santorum didn't have.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.