And at the Washington Post, @henryfarrell agrees with Nick. http://wpo.st/PhXA1
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Genuine question to both
@henryfarrell and@ncweaver is why NSA shouldn't accomplish mission as assigned by law + win credibility over time.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
There's likely little/nothing it can do to win the PR war. Only time, transparency, and results will work.
@henryfarrell@ncweaver7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Why wasn't having NTOC enough? Why hasn't it been doing defense better?@ncweaver's Q abt Dual_EC...@henryfarrell1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Susan_Hennessey@ncweaver@henryfarrell NTOC actively protects DoD networks and isn’t even in IAD…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flyryan
@flyryan Nothing's in IAD anymore per@Susan_Hennessey. It's Operations. But she used it as proof of value of merger@ncweaver@henryfarrell3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Susan_Hennessey@ncweaver@henryfarrell using dual-authorities (SIGINT and IA authorities) to do their mission.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flyryan
@flyryan Right. I'm asking why we had to move all defense to that model.@Susan_Hennessey@ncweaver@henryfarrell2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Susan_Hennessey@ncweaver@henryfarrell NTOC is a prime example of combined roles working great for defense.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@flyryan Which, I assume, is why @Susan_Hennessey used it. But does that also mean IAD ineffective? @ncweaver @henryfarrell
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.