It would be great to see serious competition to the typical IoT "upload everything to a central server" model.
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze How do you do that and still deliver what IoT is meant to deliver: a profit model in services rather than goods?1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel@mattblaze You don't. Creative a secure IoT will require a product business model. IoT sold as services will always be insecure1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Dymaxion
@Dymaxion@emptywheel I think that's right. It's not clear to me whether prod or service is the winning biz model here in any case.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze How does a product business model justify the extra cost of adding a brain to a product?@Dymaxion3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Dymaxion Some (not all) applications provide actual extra functionality the user would find worth paying for.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze In products that have margins to justify it? It seems most of the IoT products are trying to fight paper thing margins@Dymaxion1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Dymaxion I suspect those are mostly the products where there's no real compelling case for the IoT functionality.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze So what is the compelling case? Fitbit? Not even sure Nest is compelling except to affluent gadget geeks.@Dymaxion5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Dymaxion Fitbit, maybe Next, prob not much else I've seen so far.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@mattblaze So really what we're facing is attempt to create value where there is none at cost of increasing spying, insecurity? @Dymaxion
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.