The fact that Intel agencies are already talking about exploiting IoT data is a wakeup call to reject architectures that facilitate this.
-
-
.
@emptywheel@mattblaze You don't. Creative a secure IoT will require a product business model. IoT sold as services will always be insecure -
@Dymaxion@emptywheel I think that's right. It's not clear to me whether prod or service is the winning biz model here in any case. -
@mattblaze How does a product business model justify the extra cost of adding a brain to a product?@Dymaxion -
@emptywheel@Dymaxion Some (not all) applications provide actual extra functionality the user would find worth paying for. -
@mattblaze In products that have margins to justify it? It seems most of the IoT products are trying to fight paper thing margins@Dymaxion -
@emptywheel@Dymaxion I suspect those are mostly the products where there's no real compelling case for the IoT functionality. -
@mattblaze So what is the compelling case? Fitbit? Not even sure Nest is compelling except to affluent gadget geeks.@Dymaxion -
@emptywheel@Dymaxion Fitbit, maybe Next, prob not much else I've seen so far. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.