Is there an argument here other than "respect mah authoritah?"http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/27/health-wonks-and-bernie-bros …
-
-
@emptywheel@ddayen actually it wasn't an argument abt the substance but the assumptions that disagreeing makes you a shill. -
@armandodkos@emptywheel maybe I just think his arguments on the substance are garbage. Is that allowed? Please police me. -
@ddayen@emptywheel Of course. His ARGUMENTS. Not that he is a shill. As smart as you are I know you must see the difference. -
@armandodkos Best as I can tell--bc he's on his third post on this--his argument is, "Paul Krugman gets to define who is a wonk."@ddayen -
@emptywheel@ddayen I disagree. He's saying he is a wonk not a shill. If you disagree with me that doesnt make me a shill. It's pretty clear -
@armandodkos@emptywheel I remember when bloggers would mock journalists who tried to define the boundaries of serious discourse -
@ddayen@emptywheel Now that is a fair point. I agree with that critique of Krugman here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.