@tqbf @holmesworcester If that happens--if he goes to CNN & NHTSA can show they learned there, before GM goes to CISA--no reg immunity.
@tqbf Not according to author of bill, FSR, and others. No. Once you disclose, no reg. @mattblaze @holmesworcester
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester No reg based on YOUR OWN DISCLOSURE. No impact on OTHER disclosures. -
@tqbf If that other disclosure is different from what was initially disclosed. But not if it's the same thing.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester I’m sorry but I just don’t see how you draw that conclusion from the law. -
@tqbf I see that.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester Could you cite the part of omnicisa from which you’ve drawn that conclusion? -
@tqbf It's same language (but even broader) as what is in CISA. I get I'm not going to convince you. That's fine@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@holmesworcester The notion that CISA provides amnesty for breaches disclosed in indications is an extraordinary claim. -
@tqbf I'm saying it provides regulatory immunity. That's slightly different.@holmesworcester - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester It’s not a security amnesty bill! -
@mattblaze (sorry, i’ll try to keep you off rest of CCs)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.