@tqbf Well, Chrysler was made to. I raise GM bc only backed CISA when they realized hackers wouldn't sit on disclosures @holmesworcester
@tqbf Again, not if GM beats him to DHS. And I THINK GM's new CISO framework gives them a window here. @mattblaze @holmesworcester
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester Again: without CISA, they don’t get the early notice you’re considering AT ALL. -
@tqbf Sure. So? NHTSA learned abt Chrysler fr Wired. Issued recall.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester If Chrysler had disclosed indicator, and then Wired published, NTHSA could still regulate! -
@tqbf Not according to author of bill, FSR, and others. No. Once you disclose, no reg.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester No reg based on YOUR OWN DISCLOSURE. No impact on OTHER disclosures. -
@tqbf If that other disclosure is different from what was initially disclosed. But not if it's the same thing.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester I’m sorry but I just don’t see how you draw that conclusion from the law. -
@tqbf I see that.@mattblaze@holmesworcester - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester I’m still unclear. How does beating Miller to DHS help? Once he gets to DHS, they can act. -
@tqbf No. Once GM self-discloses, govt can't initiate regulatory action.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester That just doesn’t seem accurate. If GM murders someone and shares under CISA, they aren’t off hook. -
@tqbf They're not off the hook for liability in courts. They're not off the hook if they broke the law.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester They’re not off the hook in ANY SENSE so long as NTHSA/DHS has multiple sources, which they will.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.