@tqbf Not true, eg, in car hacks. They learned from press. If GM had gone under CISA, no recall. @holmesworcester
@tqbf Sure. All Im saying is there are multiple ways for GM to report under terms of cyber sig in CISA. @mattblaze @holmesworcester
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester The only scenario where it could requires Charlie Miller to be complicit in avoiding recall. -
@tqbf Again, not if GM beats him to DHS. And I THINK GM's new CISO framework gives them a window here.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester Again: without CISA, they don’t get the early notice you’re considering AT ALL. -
@tqbf Sure. So? NHTSA learned abt Chrysler fr Wired. Issued recall.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester If Chrysler had disclosed indicator, and then Wired published, NTHSA could still regulate! -
@tqbf Not according to author of bill, FSR, and others. No. Once you disclose, no reg.@mattblaze@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester No reg based on YOUR OWN DISCLOSURE. No impact on OTHER disclosures. -
@tqbf If that other disclosure is different from what was initially disclosed. But not if it's the same thing.@mattblaze@holmesworcester - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester But Miller can already have that complicity under existing law (just: accept $ not to report)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze@holmesworcester The crux of your argument is that CISA enables GM to avoid a recall via quid-pro-quo. But no.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.