@holmesworcester Yes. And as I note there, one of authors of bill did not refute that's what the language does. @tqbf
-
-
@emptywheel@holmesworcester Well, I was asked what I found misleading about FFTF lang, this is an example, & these tweets are unpersuasive. -
@tqbf Sorry. You're saying the author of the bill doesn't know what it says?@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@holmesworcester No, if you reread what I wrote, you’ll see that I did not in fact say that. -
@tqbf You're saying tweets that reference what author of bill said abt this Q are unpersuasive. What would persuade you?@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@holmesworcester No, I’m saying that “the author of the bill didn’t rebut me” isn’t a persuasive argument. -
@tqbf The author of the bill was asked a specific question. He said, basically, You're right, if co doesn't break law.@holmesworcester -
@emptywheel@holmesworcester FFTF’s page suggests quid-pro-quo: Experian has huge breach, but shares indicators. “Total immunity”. FALSE. -
@tqbf convince@emptywheel our representation is wrong, & we’ll change it. Read her blog. She has been in the weeds longer than you or I. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.