NSA Privacy Officer Rebecca Richards Explains What Connection Chaining Is! https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/01/15/nsa-privacy-officer-rebecca-richards-explains-what-connection-chaining-is/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Near end, you say NSA's own query exempt from accuracy review. Should that say NSA's initial analysis (since query is incl'd)?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson Query of provider is included but not their own query, right?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Oh, I see - of Enterprise Architecture?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson Right. As described providers will get many selectors based off returns fr EA query. So is integrity of that unquestioned?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'd see oversight/integrity for that data as coming from FISC/RAS process. But true, report doesn't mention that in this section1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson But doesn't it go: RAS > EA query > Provider query? RAS is the input there, not the output, as I read it (tho not sure)3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ...something funny happens on the way to the provider? 2/24 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson So if, for any of those comms, recipient (the new identifier) is misidentified, it will result in USPs queried falsely 3/31 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel yep, fair point. I think that's a legit issue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RachelBLevinson And if EA query is, instead, other kinds of connections/algos, then there's more room for error.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.