This reaction-common in academia/tech- shows additional harm of PRB. People USG needs will NEVER EVER work for them. https://twitter.com/ncweaver/status/682220338051088384 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey Was actually wondering if your piece on CISA had been PRBed, given it is much more candid than any other discussion of it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel 100% of every thing I write publicly goes through PBR. When I asked what I could write w/o submitting they said "a cookbook."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey I bet someone could make them regret cookbook permission. So that means details you included were just withheld by choice?3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Who "withheld" here? My piece described ECPA issues private sector has long opined, + personal (not govt) read of leg language.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Susan_Hennessey Point is it's a lot easier to pass legislation (and avoid narrowing to achieve JUST needed purpose) if you obscure it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.