@emptywheel That's the all I got in those screenshots
-
-
Replying to @IAStartingLine
.
@IAStartingLine So you have no evidence of four users looking at Hillary stuff, just that 4 users were on VAN during very busy period?4 replies 6 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel 4 user names were running those specific searches on Clinton proprietary data2 replies 5 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @IAStartingLine
.
@IAStartingLine Again, what I see are searches divorced from user names. Does one exist that ties actions to names?5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Switches in tense are odd: "Creates folder. Searched. Logs into. Creates user. Saved list." Not Searches, Saves.@IAStartingLine3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Juan_de_Vashon
@John_de_Vashon Well before that what people are calling evidence is not. It may exist. But it hasn't been shown.
@IAStartingLine1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The more I read this stuff-and I do have DB experience-the more these look contrived rather than actual logs.@IAStartingLine1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Juan_de_Vashon
@John_de_Vashon They're not logs. So I'm wondering why we're not looking at the logs.
@IAStartingLine2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Probably because@TheDemocrats@DWStweets won't show anyone the actual logs? WAG there...@IAStartingLine1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Juan_de_Vashon
@emptywheel OK: last post: "Logs into AL from Sanders HQ Office IP" These are purpose-fabricated.@TheDemocrats@DWStweets@IAStartingLine1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@John_de_Vashon Let me be clear: it is TOTALLY possible they ran searches and assumed we trust them on those searches. But not log files.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.