@HarleyGeiger @emptywheel @normative Now with firm ground underneath them, it's open season on the American people.
-
-
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger@emptywheel DEA doesn’t get to use this authority.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@HarleyGeiger@emptywheel Why do you say that? The act + 12333 says intelligence must help domestic law enforcement.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob USAF did not, & perhaps could not, change 12333. Where does USAF require info-sharing w non-FBI law enfor?@normative@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@HarleyGeiger@normative@emptywheel where does it forbid the FBI from sharing with other law enforcement?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger@emptywheel Minimization procedures permit sharing of info that is evidence of a crime, not on demand.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Under which section?@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger 50 USC §1861(g)(2)(C)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative You're suggesting rules on this metadata are going to be more stringent than 702 rules on metadata?@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative@ErrataRob Twofold rationale: 1) 215 targets US persons, so more protection, 2) Feds want to keep 702 loose.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@HarleyGeiger Is there a statutory reason to believe that, given that statutory language very similar? @normative @ErrataRob
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.