@ErrataRob @emptywheel For what it's worth, Bob, I'm with @normative. The law pre-USAF was much worse than post-USAF.
@normative You're suggesting rules on this metadata are going to be more stringent than 702 rules on metadata? @ErrataRob @HarleyGeiger
-
-
@emptywheel@normative@ErrataRob Twofold rationale: 1) 215 targets US persons, so more protection, 2) Feds want to keep 702 loose. -
@HarleyGeiger So yes, you are suggesting rules that permit copying of entire 702 metadata databases won't apply here?@normative@ErrataRob -
@emptywheel I dont believe we said that at all, no. Point is USAF didn't worsen info sharing provision of current law.@normative@ErrataRob -
@HarleyGeiger@normative said, "Minimization procedures permit sharing of info that is evidence of a crime, not on demand."@ErrataRob
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@ErrataRob@HarleyGeiger Wholesale copying and dissemination… to DEA? That would be news to me.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.