A response from @emptywheel. We're talking past each other on some big points but it some raises interesting Qs.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/673336244370190337 …
@Susan_Hennessey Thanks for reading. Which points are we talking past each other?
-
-
@emptywheel I want to take time for thoughtful response re: white bombing prosecution numbers and to see if you're right on the#s thereThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel But the larger point is I DO think the law results in disparate impact of Muslims in many ways. 1. Through potential for abuseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel and 2. through material support and attempt charges as applied. -
@Susan_Hennessey I think I took disparate claim from treatment of guns but not bombs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Point was disparate impact isn't result of what FBI calls terrorism day one. More importantly creating new statute is bad fix -
@Susan_Hennessey I see disparate treatment coming from the attention & SIGINT. We can claim terror motives w/Muslims bc more gets collected -
@emptywheel I'm unable to talk specifics of IC/FBI collection+ rules, so I don't want to engage on that point only to cop out w/ "can't say"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.