Still no corporate media coverage of @fbi director committing perjury of Congress over warrant requirements http://nstarpost.com/mobile/displayarticle.aspx?smid=17518&aid=145186 …
-
-
Replying to @MinneapoliSam
@MinneapoliSam Also, FBI has said some of that is consensual. I agree it SHOULD require warrants but law right now unclear at best.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel the DoJ requirements are clear and over a month old3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MinneapoliSam
@MinneapoliSam In any case, even if Comey were lying to Congress, it'd be perjury only if sworn. & DOJ has made prosecuting that impossible1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel DoJ Sep 4 "must now obtain a search warrant" FBI Director Oct. 22 "Don't believe" we need warrants http://nstarpost.com/17518/145186/a/updated-fbi-continues-to-operate-spy-planes-without-warrants-despite-federal-rul …2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MinneapoliSam
@MinneapoliSam You're simply misreading the policy, with its giant exceptions, of which this is one. That policy should be your complaint.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Curious, would a reasonable person think the exceptions violate the 4th Amendment?
@emptywheel@MinneapoliSam3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KanysLupin A "reasonable" judge looking at case law, or reasonable person? Different issue. ~5 MJs would not, others would @MinneapoliSam
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.