What he actually means is that an Article III judge reviews an application permitted by Congressional statute.https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/661909942216081408 …
@BradMossEsq Nope. Speaks to govt officials briefing abt what it did w/authorities and leaving out bulk programs. @matthew_d_green
-
-
@emptywheel@matthew_d_green Again, if you ever actually worked in this arena, instead of memorizing reports, you'd have a better idea. -
@BradMossEsq Awwww. Poor Brad once again responds illogically when confronted w/fact he doesn't know WTF he's talking abt@matthew_d_green -
@emptywheel@matthew_d_green Awww, poor Marcy, will continue memorizing reports while others actually deal w/ Govt bureaucracy. -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel The difference between public law and "government bureaucracy" is precisely what has everyone so concerned. -
@matthew_d_green Take up your complaint with Congress. You're never going to make surveillance law public though. Not all of it. -
@matthew_d_green Not when it's dealing with foreign nationals who are agents of a power -
@BradMossEsq I would content myself with laws that limit collection of everyone else's communications. That's literally all I ask. -
@matthew_d_green Intel analysts will tell you that will interfere with their ability to do their job. Just FYI - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.